Tom Lane-2 wrote: > > Neil Best <nbest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Tom Lane<tgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> BTW, the "SSL renegotiation failure" bit >>> suggests that it could have been an OpenSSL bug not a real network >>> lossage, so you might want to see how up-to-date your openssl libraries >>> are. > >> Thanks for your comments, Tom. The operation seems more reliable if I >> move the data to the server and do it across a local connection, which >> I presume does not involve SSL, so that may be the weak link as you >> surmise. Would you expect the SSL library problem more likely to be >> on the server or the client, or is it just hard to say? > > You're talking like you've found this to be repeatable. Is it? > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/%5Ccopy%3A-unexpected-response-%284%29-tp24866027p24973703.html Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
