"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 19:16 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> Oh? You think RH/Cent is going to change that default now? Think again. > I thought they would get around to changing it now. "They" is me, and it's not changing. I'm not blowing a chance at in-place upgrade to switch the integer-timestamp default. > because RH really can't be used as a production PostgreSQL server (if > date based data is important) I have open bugs about the lack of in-place upgrade. I have never once heard a customer complain about FP timestamps. So your position is nonsense. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
