Search Postgresql Archives

Re: For production: 8.4 or 8.3?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Tory M Blue <tmblue@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: For production: 8.4 or 8.3?
From: Scott Mead <scott.lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 17:01:15 -0400
Cc: Phoenix Kiula <phoenix.kiula@xxxxxxxxx>, PG-General Mailing List <pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <8a547c840907271345s5f02abfh5d81ca7a3b026e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Tory M Blue <tmblue@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

And those that have multiple TB's of data, weee another dump and
restore upgrade (pfffft!!!!!)

pg_migrator doesn't need to dump -> restore, it can do an in-place upgrade of the datafiles for you.

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2009-06/msg00031.php

--Scott

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

References:
- For production: 8.4 or 8.3?
  - From: Phoenix Kiula
- Re: For production: 8.4 or 8.3?
  - From: Tory M Blue

Prev by Date: Re: For production: 8.4 or 8.3?
Next by Date: Re: For production: 8.4 or 8.3?
Previous by thread: Re: For production: 8.4 or 8.3?
Next by thread: Video available for PGDay SJC '09
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Postgresql Jobs] [Postgresql Admin] [Postgresql Performance] [Linux Clusters] [PHP Home] [PHP on Windows] [Kernel Newbies] [PHP Classes] [PHP Books] [PHP Databases] [Postgresql & PHP] [Yosemite]

Powered by Linux