Search Postgresql Archives

Re: comparing NEW and OLD (any good this way?)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 01:45:36PM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> http://www.postgres.cz/index.php/PostgreSQL_SQL_Tricks

Just had a quick flick through your list and one of the early ones stuck
out:

  http://www.postgres.cz/index.php/PostgreSQL_SQL_Tricks#Attention_on_IS_NULL_and_IS_NOT_NULL_operators_for_composite_types

is scary; even worse is that it was changed to be like this in 8.2
because the standard says it should behave this way.  What on earth were
they thinking when they defined the standard this way?

-- 
  Sam  http://samason.me.uk/

-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux