Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Checkpoint Tuning Question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 8 Jul 2009, Dan Armbrust wrote:

My takeaway is that starting the checkpoint process is really
expensive - so I don't want to start it very frequently.  And the only
downside to longer intervals between checkpoints is a longer recovery
time if the system crashes?

And additional disk space wasted in hold the write-ahead logs. You're moving in the right direction here, the less checkpoints the better as long as you can stand the recovery time. What you'll discover if you bump checkpoint_segments up high enough is that you have to lengthen the test run you're trying, because eventually you'll reach a point where there are none of them happening during some test runs.

--
* Greg Smith gsmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD

--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux