On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 07:34 -0700, David Fetter wrote: > On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 07:11:43PM +0800, Craig Ringer wrote: > > On Sun, 2009-06-28 at 09:01 -0700, David Fetter wrote: > > > > Are there any rules of thumb to consider for making an application > > > > easier to work with a "general" replication solution? > > > > > > > > The applications I mostly deal with are e-commerce sites. > > > > > > It really depends on what replication solution you choose, along with > > > the environment you're deploying into. > > > > ... and why you need replication. Reliability/Availability? Data storage > > redundancy? Performance? And if performance, read-mostly performance or > > write-heavy performance? > > It's this kind of discussion that you might want to hire experts to > help with :) Commandprompt, Endpoint, OmniTI and the outfit I work > for, PostgreSQL Experts <http://www.pgexperts.com> would be examples. Probably should mention 2ndQuadrant also, since we have an Italian office (for the original poster) and we have been developing replication for PostgreSQL for some time now. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
