On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 02:17:02PM +0100, Dave Page wrote: > On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 2:11 PM, David Fetter<david@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > There is no general way to do that, apart from creating a test suite > > specific to your scenario and hoping it doesn't have more bugs that > > the thing it's testing. > > You don't have to tell me that :-) I didn't imagine I did. :) > > Sometimes it's good not to agree with the premises underlying a > > question, and I believe this is one of those times. > > Auditors can be a funny breed. They can, at that, but in this case, they're simply doing the normal human thing of trying to figure out whether there's a way they can push off their work to someone or something else. In this case, they can't. Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <david@xxxxxxxxxx> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fetter@xxxxxxxxx Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
