On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 16:45 -0400, Terry Lee Tucker wrote: > > -- > > * Greg Smith gsmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD > > Our circumstance here is that we will be feeding multiple warm stand-by > servers; one local and the rest remote, that is, at least one in other state > and possibly another in another city. We didn't want the WAL shipping process > to fail because one of the nodes might be down. To circumvent that, we > thought the best approach to take was to pump the WAL logs to a central > machine on-site, and have the warm stand-by servers pick up their files from > the central storage device. This is why we were thinking about changing > pg_standby. PITRTools 1.2 has queuing which can deal with this problem. I don't know if walmgr does. Joshua D. Drake > > Thanks for all the help... > -- > > Work: 1-336-372-6812 > Cell: 1-336-404-6987 > email: terry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > -- PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdrake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Consulting, Development, Support, Training 503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997 -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
