Tom Lane-2 wrote: > > miller_2555 <nabble.30.miller_2555@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> I appreciate the clarification on the output. Given the assignment >> appears >> correct, what is the appropriate method to access the elements of the >> multidimensional array? > > I think what you're missing is the distinction between slice and simple > element access, ie instead of this > > (myvar[i]).multidimarray[j] > > you'd need something like this > > (myvar[i]).multidimarray[j][1:3] > > The proposed loop coding is uselessly overcomplicated because it > supposes that 2-D arrays could be nonrectangular. Just use array_lower > and array_upper on dimension 2 of the 2-D array in the innermost loop. > > You might want to practice a bit with a plain 2-D array field before > getting into the complexity of embedding it in a composite embedded > in an array ... > > regards, tom lane > Thanks - The example is overdone, but it seemed the most illustrative. For those who would like to see corrected code in case they run into the same issue, I have appended a new function definition: CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION myschema.mytestfunction() RETURNS void AS $BODY$ DECLARE myvar myschema.mytype[] := ARRAY[ ROW('textaa',ARRAY['textab'],ARRAY[ARRAY['textac1','textac2']])::myschema.mytype, ROW('textba',ARRAY['textbb'],ARRAY[ARRAY['textbc1','textbc2']])::myschema.mytype ]; BEGIN -- Nested loop example to output each element in multidimensional array for each composite type FOR i IN array_lower(myvar,1)..array_upper(myvar,1) LOOP FOR j IN array_lower((myvar[i]).multidimarray,1)..array_upper((myvar[i]).multidimarray,1) LOOP /* OLD: FOR k IN array_lower((myvar[i]).multidimarray[j],1)..array_upper((myvar[i]).multidimarray[j],1) LOOP */ FOR k IN array_lower((myvar[i]).multidimarray,2)..array_upper((myvar[i]).multidimarray,2) LOOP RAISE INFO '%',(myvar[i]).multidimarray[j][k]; END LOOP; END LOOP; END LOOP; END $BODY$ LANGUAGE 'plpgsql'; I had assumed that the whole slice of a sub-array would have been returned as a 1-D array by accessing an element of the "outer" array, but that does not appear the case. Thanks for the quick help and great product! -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Multidimensional-array-definition-in-composite-type-appears-parsed-as-string-tp23749072p23764714.html Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general