now I know it boils down to pg_relation_size at the end of the day, cos that's what psql uses. But please tell me guys, that I am not the only one who would expect true size of table in \dt+ ? At the end of the day, postgresql 'cheats' behind scenes with toast, and avid user shouldn't really need to account for that!. Btw, pgAdmin is able to display that information properly. -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
