> Continuent works (AFAIK) like pgpool clustering, it sends the same > statements to both/all servers in the cluster but it has no insight to the > servers beyond this, so if via a direct connection server A becomes out of > sync with server B then continuent is oblivious. So can the same be said for pgpool then? thanks, -Alan -- “Mother Nature doesn’t do bailouts.” - Glenn Prickett -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general