2009/5/8 David Fetter <david@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 06:40:33PM -0300, Emanuel Calvo Franco wrote:
>>
>> I test it in the first time :)
>>
>> With the 'order by' it works well, but in 'theory'
>
> The theory under which you should operate is that the underlying
> implementation only gives you the orderings you ask for. This way,
> when other beneficial implementation changes happen, they will not
> surprise you. :)
Yeap. now it have more sense.
Is a question of performance and to take notice of that.
Cool.
Thanks to all!,
--
Emanuel Calvo Franco
Sumate al ARPUG !
( www.arpug.com.ar)
ArPUG / AOSUG Member
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
