I'll run a java webapp running in tomcat connected to postgres via jdbc.
BTW, why the access method should be important ?
I mean, my main question is .... should pg_xlog be located on a
different EBS than data ?
My doubt is really about logical vs physical disk, since i think EBS is
logical and two EBS disks could be run on the same physical disk.....so
why to separate data and pg_xlog ? Is it still useful ? It 's like to
put data and pg_xlog on two partitions of the same disk.
Cheers,
ste
John R Pierce wrote:
Bob Pawley wrote:
From your experience could it be used in similar fashion as a website
-> running a Postgresql database and having users access the database
through an interface?
If so, would the users need a Java environment installed on their
machines ...
um, the users would need a Java environment if they were running Java
applications.
or would the interface connect directley to Postgresql - like a
website??
what 'interface' are you referring to ? a client application can
connect to a postgres server with the postgres protocol, by default
over port 5432/tcp... a client application would do this using libpq,
or a native interface like jdbc (if the client is java)
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
