Robert Haas <robertmhaas@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> If there's a camp that actually *wants* a NULL result for this case, >> I missed the reasoning. > So that we don't break existing apps because of an issue that is > trivial to work around. We would only be breaking them if a NULL result were actually the correct behavior for the application's requirements, which seems a bit unlikely. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
