On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 3:26 PM, John Cheng <chonger.cheng@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Comparison between MySQL using the MyISAM engine with PostgreSQL is really > not sensible. For one, the MyISAM engine does not have transaction and > foreign key support, while PostgreSQL supports transaction and foreign key. > Would anyone really give up transaction and integrity for slightly more > performance? Sure, if the application fit. If I have to load 100Meg files into a db, run some simple extraction on them, and output it back out, and can recreate all my data at the drop of a hat, then mysql / myisam might be a good match. I am no a fan of MySQL, more because the company behind it seems to be lost and drifting than the db itself. Bugs that are 5 years old finally getting fixed after Monty chided them in december? Come on, PostgreSQL comes out with a near bug free new version every 1 to 2 years. PostgreSQL stomps bugs in hours or days that MySQL AB takes YEARS to fix, and then get reintroduced (see the order by on innodb indexed field debacle for that story) and I just don't trust the company or the db for anything complex. But as a tool it has some uses that it's good enough at I could use it if I had to. -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
