On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 15:26 -0700, Mike Christensen wrote: > I would only like this as a feature if the optimizer can really take > advantage of this. Clustering on every insert or update just for the > fun of it won't really give us anything but more expensive writes. > > I kinda figured if SQL Server and Oracle have it, they probably take > full advantage of it for reads.. With SQLServer and Oracle the optimization is implicit in the physical design of the index. The Postgres equivalent would be a grouped index, not necessarily clustered in the same way. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
