Search Postgresql Archives

Re: pg_toast_temp_xx AND pg_temp_xx SCHEMAS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Vyacheslav Kalinin <vka@xxxxxxxx> writes:
>> They're just there to hold temporary tables (so that the names of such
>> tables don't conflict with any non-temporary tables).  The reason they
>> seem to accumulate is we only create one when needed, and there's one
>> for each concurrently executing backend if it creates any temp tables.

> Hm, do they get garbage-collected in any way? I have several such schemes
> that won't disappear even though no other sessions but one is there.

No, that would just be a waste of cycles since they'll be needed again
eventually.  The steady-state situation should be that you have
max_connections of them, more or less, if you ever get up to
max_connections live connections.

> On a side note: I can drop temporary tables of other sessions via "DROP
> pg_temp_xx.table" (although I can't seem to affect table data seen from
> other session). Is there any security issues/gotchas here?

If you can do that without being superuser, I'd take an interest.
Otherwise the answer is "don't do that".

			regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux