On Mar 2, 5:35 pm, pie...@xxxxxxxxxxxx (John R Pierce) wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > shadrack <shadke...@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > >> My basic question is...are php4 and postgresql 8.3 compatible? > >> I'm running Linux Redhat 3.4.6, php4.3.9, and postgresql 8.3. I know, > >> some of those versions are old...its government, and I unfortunately > >> don't have control over the version. > > > Er ... Red Hat *what*? I don't think they ever used such a version > > number. If they did it was a very long time ago (for calibration, > > they were just about to release RHL 7.3 when I joined the company, > > in 2001). > > well, remember, they went Red Hat Linux 7.x, 8.x, 9 then very quickly > switched to Red Hat Enterprise Linux 2, 2.1, 3, 4, and currently RHEL > 5. RHEL 3 has had several quarterly updates, most recent of which is > u9(I think), sometimes referred to as 3.9. > > if its RHEL 3 update-something that shadrack is discussing, it came with > php 4.3.2 and rh-postgresql 7.3.21 (shudder!) > > -- > Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-gene...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) > To make changes to your subscription:http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general Yes, we had postgresql 7.3 but I installed postgresql 8.3 onto the rhel3. Do you think its going to work? What's the solution that involves the least work, considering I'm not the one maintaining these machines? Do you think it would be simple for the IT person to update to rhel5 and php5? Its basically just one machine that he would have to update. Thoughts? Thanks so much for all the feedback. shad -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
