Search Postgresql Archives

Re: max_fsm_relations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 12:37 -0700, Gauthier, Dave wrote:
> I just did a Vacuum Analyze on a DB.  It worked OK, but I got...
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> NOTICE: max_fsm_relations(1000) equals the number of relations checked
> 
> HINT:  You have at least 1000 relations.  Consider increasing the
> configuration parameter “max_fsm_relations”
> 
>  
> 
> I browsed around and learned that this has to do with keeping track of
> free disk space.
> 
> Q: Is there a problem with leaving this alone?  How serious is this if
> it is a problem?
> 
> Q: Is there a way I can shrink this number (reload the data to consume
> the free space perhaps?)

This is "relations" which means tables, indexes etc... So unless you
start dropping things, no you can't reduce it.

Just increase it a bit (say 20%) it won't hurt you.

Note it does use a little shared_memory,.

Joshua D. Drake


> 
>  
> 
> Thanks
> 
> -dave
> 
>  
> 
> 
-- 
PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdrake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
   Consulting, Development, Support, Training
   503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/
   The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997


-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux