Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Question about no unchanging update rule + ALTER

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Josh Trutwin wrote:
> I found the following on a blog post
> (http://www.depesz.com/index.php/2007/09/08/avoiding-empty-updates/)
> which had a rule to prevent empty updates:
> 
> CREATE RULE no_unchanging_updates AS
> ON UPDATE
> TO test_table
> WHERE ROW(OLD.*) IS NOT DISTINCT FROM ROW(NEW.*)
> DO INSTEAD NOTHING;
> 
> Works great, but problem comes when I alter the table and add a new
> column, it appears the rule doesn't allow an update after adding a
> new column via ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN.
> 
> I created the rule above, then did:
> 
> ALTER TABLE test_table ADD COLUMN foo TEXT;
> 
> => UPDATE test_table SET foo = 'bar';
> UPDATE 0
> 
> When doing a \d on the table I notice the rule is expanded at the
> time of creation to include each column in an expression, but it is
> not updated from the ALTER TABLE command.
> 
> Do I have to drop and recreate this rule after every ALTER TABLE
> ADD/DELETE column? 

Quite possibly - I seem to remember that id *does* expand the * to an
explicit list of columns. That's what you want sometimes. If the whole
point of the view is to provide a stable interface to an application,
you don't want it changing when you change underlying tables.

> Or would the following trigger (also found on
> blog post) be a better solution as my app is for a "plugin" builder
> where adding/deleting/changing fields is common:
> 
> CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION prevent_empty_updates() RETURNS trigger as
> $BODY$
> DECLARE
>   BEGIN
>     IF ROW(OLD.*) IS DISTINCT FROM ROW(NEW.*) THEN
>       RETURN NEW;
>     END IF;
>     RETURN NULL;
>   END;
> $BODY$ language plpgsql;
> 
> CREATE TRIGGER prevent_empty_updates BEFORE UPDATE ON test FOR EACH
> ROW EXECUTE PROCEDURE prevent_empty_updates();
> 
> Actually after writing this, this TOO does not seem to work after an
> ADD COLUMN.  :/  Any suggestions?

Try disconnecting and reconnecting to the database - that should do it.
The function will be "compiled" the first time it is called in a session
, so the * is probably getting expanded then. There's been a lot of work
done to provide automatic re-planning in these sort of situations, but
maybe you're hitting a corner-case.

-- 
  Richard Huxton
  Archonet Ltd

-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux