On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 5:21 AM, Gregory Stark <stark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I'm not sure using xmin is such a great idea really. It's handy for ad-hoc > queries but there are all kinds of cases where it might not give you the > results you expect. Its been a while since the following emails were written. Has the treatment of xmin changed since then, or is using a timestamp a better practice? http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-novice/2007-02/msg00079.php http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2004-02/msg00654.php -- Regards, Richard Broersma Jr. Visit the Los Angeles PostgreSQL Users Group (LAPUG) http://pugs.postgresql.org/lapug -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
