Search Postgresql Archives

Re: surprising results with random()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Steve Atkins wrote:

> 
> On Feb 23, 2009, at 2:09 PM, Jessi Berkelhammer wrote:
> 
> >Hi,
> >
> >I have a view in which I want to randomly assign values if certain
> >conditions hold. I was getting surprising results. Here is a (very)
> >simplified version of the view, which seems to indicate the problem:
> >
> >CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW test_view AS
> >SELECT
> >	CASE
> >		WHEN random() < .3333 THEN '1'
> >		WHEN random() < .3333 THEN '2'
> >		ELSE '3'
> >	END AS test_value
> >
> >FROM client ;
> >
> >It seems this should generate a random number between 0 and 1, and set
> >test_value to '1' if this first generated number is less than .3333.
> >Otherwise, it should generate another random number, and set  
> >test_value
> >to '2' if this is less than .3333. And if neither of the random  
> >numbers
> >are less than .3333, it should set test_value to '3'. It seems to me
> >that there should be a relative even distribution of the 3 values.
> >
> >
> >However when I run this, the values are always similar to what is  
> >below:
> >
> >X_test=>  select test_value, count(*) from test_view group by 1  
> >order by 1;
> >test_value | count
> >------------+-------
> >1          | 23947
> >2          | 16061
> >3          | 32443
> >
> >Why are there significantly fewer 2s? I understand that random() is  
> >not
> >truly random, and that the seed affects this value. But it still
> >confuses me that, no matter how many times I run this, there are  
> >always
> >so few 2s. If it is generating an independent random number in the
> >second call to random(), then I don't know why there are more so many
> >more 1s than 2s.
> 
> Nope, it's nothing to do with random(), it's that your maths is wrong.
> 
> There are 9 possible cases. In 3 of them you return 1. In 2 of them you
> return 2. In the remaining 4 cases you return 3.
> 
> If you were to run this 72451 times I'd expect to see
> 1:  24150 = 72451 * 3/9
> 2: 16100 = 72451 * 2/9
> 3: 32200 = 72451 * 4/9
> 
> Which, unsurprisingly, is fairly close to what you get.
> 
> Cheers,
>   Steve

this looks like an attempt to understand the monty hall problem.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monty_Hall_problem
except that there's no goat :(

cheers,
raf


-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux