John R Pierce <pierce@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> "Brent Wood" <b.wood@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >>> Perhaps \o+ as a future fix for this? >> I'd prefer "\o >>file" but maybe I'm too steeped in unix-isms. > \o+ is reasonably consistent with the other \ command usages... Not really; none of the other commands interpret + as meaning "append to an existing file". They tend to take it as meaning "do something *in addition to* what you normally do", not to do something that is significantly different from the base command. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
