* Tom Lane (tgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > Hmm ... a gig here, a gig there, pretty soon you're talking about real > memory? He's got several sorts and hashes that are each taking over > 100MB according to the memory context dump, so it seems impossible that > it all fits into a strict 32-bit address space. There's surely no harm > in double-checking the executable's file type though. Argh, it's late and I'm not thinking. Yeah, I had seen the 100M hashes and just wasn't thinking clearly. Sorry for the noise. Stephen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
