On Fri, 30 Jan 2009 20:46:22 +0000 Gregory Stark <stark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > rhubbell <Rhubbell@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > What's your list look like? Or maybe you want everyone else to do your work > > for you and don't have anything to share. > > Heh, fair enough. Perhaps I should just say you should come to FOSDEM though > :) Haha, yeah buy the book, come to the show, see the movie. Well I don't know what is FOSDEM. Will the talks be placed online at some point? Up to each contributor? I'll check out what's FOSDEM. > > The usual bugaboos are things like having to do a dump/restore to upgrade, > weak support for partitioning, no index-only-scans, etc. Things which have > been mentioned several times. > > One thing which has *not* been mentioned which i find positively shocking is > VACUUM. This was once our single biggest source of user complaints. Between > Autovacuum improvements and HOT previously and the free space map in 8.4 the > situation will be much improved. However there are still some common usage > patterns where people run into problems. I think it was mentioned. Anyway glad to see that there's vibrant discussion here. Usually a sign of a healthy community. > > -- > Gregory Stark > EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com > Ask me about EnterpriseDB's On-Demand Production Tuning -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
