Hey folks, I have question really for all mighty developers, but don't want to spam -hackers with it. why : select * from foo where X in (1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1) --- same values in search. or select * from foo where (x,y) in ((1,2),(1,2),(1,2),(1,2),(1,2),(1,2),(1,2)); never gets optimized by planner, etc ? Is it just not worth optimizing from pg side? I am sure, it would make sense to actually reorder these values, so that index/whatnot could pick it up faster. Just another one of those, 'why' (not) questions from my side. thanks. -- GJ -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
