Francisco Figueiredo Jr. wrote:
About the memory issue of Npgsql, did you try to use a prepared statement for this? We have some performance improvements when handling bytea values but only when the NpgsqlCommand.Prepare() method is called. I hope it helps.
Hi Francisco, Yes it did help. Thank you very much. (P.S. Npgsql is great!) Thanks. Howard Cole www.selestial.com -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
