and we also oppose to answering on top of message, and citing everything underneeth. Why? Because your words should say what you mean, not show it by its look. Hence, plain ascii is enough for us - and should be for every intelligent human being. On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 8:32 PM, Jason Long <mailing.list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I don't mean to be a pain either and I mean no disrespect to anyone on this > list in the following comments. > > However, this is about the most anal list ever. > I see so many emails on here about people complaining regarding the proper > way to reply or post to the list. > > I used larger font to point point out my statement from the code. I also > did not realize it appeared that large to you. > > My res is 2560X1600 so it didn't look that large. > > I apologize. > > Just out of curiosity, why are you so apposed to HTML in a email? > > Raymond O'Donnell wrote: > > On 15/01/2009 20:06, Jason Long wrote: > > <big><big><b>I am attempting to vacuum...[snip] > > I don't mean to be a pain, but could you please avoid HUGE type sizes > such as the above....or better still, avoid using HTML altogether in > your emails to this list. > > It makes it look as if you are not just shouting, but SCREAMING at the > top of your lungs! :-) > > Thanks in advance..... > > Ray. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > Raymond O'Donnell, Director of Music, Galway Cathedral, Ireland > rod@xxxxxx > Galway Cathedral Recitals: http://www.galwaycathedral.org/recitals > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > -- GJ -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
