Hi, > "Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of > tapes hurtling down the highway." -Tanenbaum, Andrew S. > (1996). Computer Networks. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 83. > ISBN 0-13-349945-6. > > A modern chrysler town and country(1) has a cargo capacity of > 140.1 cubic feet(2) letting it carry 17163 LTO4 (3) tapes at > 800GB each. > Thats 13730TB. Say it has to get from San Francisco to LA > (about 6 hrs according to google maps directions(4)), that > gives 2288TB/hour, or 5.1 terabit/second. That seems to be kind of a joke, but I heard that the french CNES (spatial agency) is doing some huge database replication between two sites thanks to big trucks carrying the data once a month, because current network devices transfer rates do not allow them to do remote replication through the network. Or maybe the reasons to this method are not only technical but economical. I have no detailed information on this, and it's more a rumour than a verified information, but should somebody know more on the subject, i'd be interested in hearing it. Vincent -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
