Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Monty on MySQL 5.1: "Oops, we did it again"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Geoffrey wrote:
Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz wrote:


On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 8:00 PM, Steve Crawford <scrawford@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:scrawford@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

http://monty-says.blogspot.com/2008/11/oops-we-did-it-again-mysql-51-released.html

    All interesting, but especially the part about half-way down under
    the heading "So what went wrong with MySQL 5.1 ?" - must-read for
    anyone involved in selecting a database.


well, at least they have replication and partitioning built in. How reliable it is, is completely another story - but still, they are a step ahead in that regard. Now I know why Tom Lane doesn't have a blog :)

Actually, he has a couple of them:

pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
.
.

:)


I'm very happy and proud to use Postgresql as the developers working on Postgresql deliver a quality product, not claim its quality.



--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux