On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 1:05 PM, Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:>>> On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 8:00 PM, Steve Crawford> <scrawford@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:>>>>>> http://monty-says.blogspot.com/2008/11/oops-we-did-it-again-mysql-51-released.html>>>> All interesting, but especially the part about half-way down under the>> heading "So what went wrong with MySQL 5.1 ?" - must-read for anyone>> involved in selecting a database.>> well, at least they have replication and partitioning built in. How reliable> it is, is completely another story - but still, they are a step ahead in> that regard.> Now I know why Tom Lane doesn't have a blog :) I'd rather do the paritioning by hand and use slony and know it worksthan rely on the code that's doing all that in mysql. If your servercrashes while updating a partitioned table, you could lose all thedata in it. Replication can mysteriously just quit working with noerrors or warning. Make your pick, half assed code that sometimes works, or postgresql. :) -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)To make changes to your subscription:http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
