Tom Lane wrote:
Siddharth Shah <siddharth.shah@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
In My Application I have only 256MB storage device and I have to
manage many other application in same storage
Quite honestly, you're going to need some other database besides
Postgres if you need a disk footprint that's only a fraction of 256MB.
It's just not designed for that. Maybe sqllite or bdb would be closer
to what you need.
regards, tom lane
Hi Tom,
I have explored SQLite & DBD but they have limitations on concurrency
My Requirement falls In between lighter & enterprise databases
So finally concluded postgres, My database size on pg is almost 12 MB
Does any cons which I am going to face with pg with slower size then
please mention.
Transaction frequencies : more select queries than insert / update
Almost 20 queries/sec is executing with current database.
- Siddharth
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
