William Temperley escribió: > Really I'm worried about reducing storage space and network overhead > - therefore a nicely compressed chunk of binary would be perfect for > the 500 values - wouldn't it? An array that large would likely be compressed by Postgres internally for storage; see http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/static/storage-toast.html -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
