> If you watch the speed, you'll see that the insert > speed is the > same, but the scan speed is worse (from 32k to 200). As I said, I don't know a lot about these things. But I would like someone to comment on this (so that maybe I will know something!): 1) I thought the poor insert performance was due to a "locality of access" in the index creation, hence I thought that since the timestamp is always increasing putting it as first column in the index should give a better insert speed, but it didn't: why???? 2) I thought that given a query like: select * from taba where clientid=2 and sensor=4 and timestamp between 'start_t' and 'end_t' there shouldn't be a huge difference in speed between an index defined as (timestamp, clientid, sensorid) and another one defined as (clientid, sensor, timestamp) but I was VERY wrong: it's 1000 times worst. How is it possible??? It's obvious I don't know how multicolumn indexes work... Can someone explain? -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
