Magnus Hagander wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Bruce Momjian <bruce@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >>> Tom Lane wrote: >>>> So, to a first approximation, the PG list traffic has been constant >>>> since 2000. Not the result I expected. >>> I also was confused by its flatness. I am finding the email traffic >>> almost impossible to continue tracking, so something different is >>> happening, but it seems it is not volume-related. >> Yes, my perception also is that it's getting harder and harder to keep >> up with the list traffic; so something is happening that a simple >> volume count doesn't capture. >> >> Does anyone have the data to break it down per mailing list? That might >> yield some more insight. > > Here's a graph of the more popular mailinglists (I couldn't include all > - the graph was completely unreadable) as seen in the archives search db. Pfft, -general didn't like that file even though it was only 60k or so. Here's a link to an uploaded version: http://www.smugmug.com/photos/421507651_8pe6C-O.png //Magnus -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
