Search Postgresql Archives

Re: MVCC and index-only read

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 12:33 PM, Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> If all the columns from the select list are available in the index, then
> Oracle will always prefer the index scan over a table scan (at least I have
> never seen something else). Even for a SELECT that returns all rows of the
> table.
>
> They are taking this concept even further with index organized tables, where
> no real "table data" exists, everything is stored in the index (quited nice
> for e.g. link tables that only consist of two or three integer columns)

Sounds like they're borrowing the code from innodb that does much the
same thing.  In Innodb, if a field is indexed, it lives only as an
index, not in the table and an index at the same time.

-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux