On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> Tom Lane escribió: >>> In the second place, the reason most of our messages don't already >>> contain schema names is that in the past we've judged it would be >>> mostly clutter; and given the infrequency of complaints I see no >>> reason to change that opinion. > >> I tend to disagree. We can run a poll in a wider audience. > > We already have a large poll: divide the number of complaints on this > topic since 7.3 came out by the number of users ... But it could well be a chicken and egg issue. People don't use a lot of schemas because the support for error reporting and other stuff is not finished, so they can't complain about a feature they don't use. Just a thought. I like schemas, but they do feel like some parts aren't quite done. -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
