Simon Riggs <simon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 17:44 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: >> That's been "extended with an epoch counter" per the docs; I don't think >> that's appropriate for the new functions, is it? > I assumed it was, so you can subtract them easily. > It can be done either way, I guess. Happy to provide what people need. I > just dreamed up a few that sounded useful. I don't think you should be inventing new functions without clear use-cases in mind. Depending on what the use is, I could see either the xid or the txid definition as being *required*. In any case, do not use the wrong return type for the definition you're implementing. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
