Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Annoying Reply-To

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 8:15 AM, Mikkel Høgh <mikkel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 17/10/2008, at 16.12, Scott Marlowe wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 7:39 AM, Collin Kidder <adderd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> I was going to stay out of this but I'll jump in and defend him. The
>>> people
>>> on this list are so pedantic, so sure that their way is the only way that
>>> they absolutely rain nuclear fire down on anyone who dares to disagree.
>>> And
>>> you wonder why no one sprang to his defense???
>>>
>>> And, I do agree with him on this issue.
>>
>> I prefer the list the way it is.  And so do a very large, very silent
>> majority of users.
>
> And no one messes with the silent majority and their spokesmen ;)

No, no one makes idiotic arguments that go against the RFCs for how to
run a mailing list and then makes the entire pgsql community change
from the rather sensible way it's done to a non-sensical way to
accomodate broken email clients.  But I thought that was rather
obvious.

-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux