2008/10/15 Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@xxxxxxxxx>: > > You'll probably have to ask that in -hackers. I'm guessing it's one > of those things that if one wrote a sufficiently large check one could > find a hacker to implement it. But I can't imagine it being a weekend > project, and if it's not already in 8.4 beta it wouldn't make it to > 8.4, but you'd have to shoot for 8.5. OK, will forward that to the more appropriate ml. > > Since you can check which columns have changed, it's pretty easy to > write a trigger that just skips its logic when none of the trigger > columns have changed. Agreed, but it's not the cleanest way (well, actually, it is, right now:). Laurent. -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
