Re: Opteron vs. Xeon performance differences

["Matthew T. O'Connor" <matthew@xxxxxxxx>]

Bart Grantham wrote:
> Forgive me if this has been beaten into the ground, but my team and I 
> couldn’t find much conclusive study or posts on this issue.  To make a 
> long story short: we’re experiencing Xeons as 50% slower than Opterons, 
> even when the Xeon has twice as much cache and a slight clock speed 
> advantage.

Simple question, you know that the plans are the same?  And I don't 
think you said conclusively that it's the same version of PGSQL on both 
servers?