Alexander Wirt [2008-10-10 7:02 +0200]: > > > So a compromise I can live with is to put it back into unstable (or > > > even just experimental), but never let it propagate to testing. Then > > > backports.org can do mechanized backports of updates without being > mechanized? No. I meant it in the sense of "run a script to create a backport from a particular testing/unstable release, as opposed to changing any source package and upload it manually to backports.org". I would very much assume that this is what currently happens with backports.org. At least that's how we do backports in Ubuntu, with "backport-source.py package_name source_release". I didn't mean "automatically move every -8.2 unstable upload to -backports", of course. > Only if they are tested carefully. Goes without saying. > And I still don't like this. --verbose ? Thanks, Martin -- Martin Pitt | http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org)
