Tom Lane escribió: > Bruce Momjian <bruce@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > I don't know of a way to make MD5 and db_user_namespace work cleanly so > > we are considering removing db_user_namespace in 8.4. > > We are? It's no more or less ugly than the day it was put in (the > MD5 encryption option was already there). > > If we had some improved replacement to offer, I'd be all for getting > rid of db_user_namespace; but without that I think we're just taking > away a feature that some people are using. At least, the argument > was made back in 2002 that people would use this if they had it; > do we have evidence to the contrary now? I also disagree with removing it. I know some people (few and far apart) are using it. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
