"Benjamin Reed" <rangerrick@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 3:46 AM, Dave Page <dpage@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I'll look at a solution for the installer - it'll probably have to be >> the symlink unless anyone else has a better idea... > Another option would be to create them as actual frameworks; instead > of libpq you'd have /Library/Frameworks/pq.framework (and all the > files/directories as required) and then people could compile with > "-framework pq" and the OSX linker would do the write thing without > having to dirty a system library path (/usr/lib) with symlinks. Uh, it's not apparent to me why dropping stuff into /Library is any better than dropping it into /usr/lib? regards, tom lane
