Re: 64-bit Compile Failure on Solaris 10 with OpenSSL

["Randal T. Rioux" <randy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sun, September 7, 2008 12:47 am, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Randal T. Rioux" <randy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> On Sat, September 6, 2008 8:21 pm, Tom Lane wrote:
>> ldd or local equivalent might help debug this.
>
>> bash-3.00# ldd /usr/local/lib/sparcv9/libgcc_s.so.1
>>         libc.so.1 =>     /lib/64/libc.so.1
>>         libm.so.2 =>     /lib/64/libm.so.2
>>         /platform/SUNW,Ultra-80/lib/sparcv9/libc_psr.so.1
>
> How about ldd on the libssl.so you're using?

We're getting closer...

bash-3.00# ldd /usr/local/ssl/lib/libssl.so
        libcrypto.so.0.9.8 =>    /usr/local/ssl/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.8
        libsocket.so.1 =>        /lib/64/libsocket.so.1
        libnsl.so.1 =>   /lib/64/libnsl.so.1
        libdl.so.1 =>    /lib/64/libdl.so.1
        libgcc_s.so.1 =>         (file not found)
        libgcc_s.so.1 =>         (file not found)
        libc.so.1 =>     /lib/64/libc.so.1
        libmp.so.2 =>    /lib/64/libmp.so.2
        libmd.so.1 =>    /lib/64/libmd.so.1
        libscf.so.1 =>   /lib/64/libscf.so.1
        libdoor.so.1 =>  /lib/64/libdoor.so.1
        libuutil.so.1 =>         /lib/64/libuutil.so.1
        libgen.so.1 =>   /lib/64/libgen.so.1
        libm.so.2 =>     /lib/64/libm.so.2
        /platform/SUNW,Ultra-80/lib/sparcv9/libc_psr.so.1
        /platform/SUNW,Ultra-80/lib/sparcv9/libmd_psr.so.1

Now why would libssl.so not be linked to libgcc_s.so.1? Why would
PostgreSQL care and not Apache?

Thanks so much for helping me out with this.

Randy