On Aug 28, 2008, at 3:21 PM, Matthew Dennis wrote:
I have no doubt that someone would complain about it, but I think it's better than the alternative.
Determining if changing any function will cause an index to break is not a straight-forward problem. I don't believe that PG right now keeps a graph of which functions call which, so replacing a function deep in the logical calling hierarchy could break the index as easily as one mentioned at the top.
