-----Original Message----- From: Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@xxxxxxxxx> >If you throw enough drives on a quality RAID controller at it you can >get very good throughput. If you're looking at read only / read >mostly, then RAID5 or 6 might be a better choice than RAID-10. But >RAID 10 is my default choice unless testing shows RAID-5/6 can beat >it. I'm loading my slave server with RAID-0 based on 3 IDE 7200 Drives. Is this worst off than a RAID 5 implementation?
