On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Scott Marlowe wrote: > The generic solution without making too much work is to store similar > data types in an arrayed type in the db. That's a good idea. I'll have to play w/ this one. Thanks.
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Scott Marlowe wrote: > The generic solution without making too much work is to store similar > data types in an arrayed type in the db. That's a good idea. I'll have to play w/ this one. Thanks.
|