Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Vacuum Vs Vacuum Full

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tom Lane wrote:
"Matthew T. O'Connor" <matthew@xxxxxxxx> writes:
BTW, what version of PostgreSQL is this? Database-wide vacuum is no longer required for XID wraparound issues. I think this was an 8.3 change but might have happened in 8.2, I don't remember.

8.2.  But you could still get that message, even in CVS HEAD, if
autovacuum was failing to complete for some reason (and had been
failing for quite a long time).

Should that message to updated since a database-wide vacuum is no longer required, or are you saying that the message is still relevant is some corner cases?


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux