Isn't hash indexing implementation non-WAL ? Alex. On Fri, 2008-08-01 at 13:16 -0700, Joshua Drake wrote: > On Fri, 01 Aug 2008 13:07:18 -0700 > Alex Vinogradovs <AVinogradovs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > By loading in bulks, I mean I load some 40-50 thousand > > rows at once into a table that already has some millions. > > Index rebuild on that table after each 50k inserts will > > be even less efficient ;) > > Fair enough, to answer your question, "no". We don't have any non wal > table tables or index types. > > Sincerely, > > Joshua D. Drake
